Is living smaller the new living large?
This is the second edition of a Twitter Blog-off, initiated by Paul Anater of Kitchen & Residential Design.
Living Large defined
Firstly, what is the definition of ”living large”? Is it being a trendsetter? Is it being happy with what you have? Is it being green (whatever that means)?
For this discussion, let’s say “living large” means, living responsibly in terms of consumption. Consumption of everything, be it space, carbon footprint, utility usage.
There is small, and there is ridiculous.
Paul links to an article about a couple of grad students who are living in a 127SF space. That is basically a 10′x12′ room. While it isn’t impossible to call such a small space home & a place to lay your head, it’s not practical for everyone. People who work from home, for example. Or families of more than 2.
That being said, I’ve written before about how much we actually need in a home. It occurred to me while staying in a hotel suite for 2 weeks, that I was perfectly comfortable. That suite was about 300SF. Granted, it was inhabited by one – me. And my belongings – mainly clothes, toiletries and work gear like a laptop & phone.
It’s not the space. It’s the stuff we accumulate.
The 1st real problem is the stuff we accumulate over the years. How many times have you moved & never opened any of the boxes after you settled? I’ve done it. I know many people who’ve done it.
We don’t really need whatever’s in those boxes. But we lug them around like it’s life support. And the bigger the place we live, the more crap we gather. We’re magnets for clutter; the more we have the more we attract. It’s a viscious self perpetuating cycle. read more >>>>>>









